On the sbottom resonance in dark matter scattering
Paolo Gondolo (Utah U.), Stefano Scopel (Sogang U.)

TL;DR
This paper critically examines the supposed sbottom resonance in neutralino-nucleus scattering, providing analytical evidence that such a resonance does not exist at the commonly assumed mass difference, impacting dark matter detection models.
Contribution
The authors analytically demonstrate that the sbottom resonance at the neutralino-sbottom mass difference equals the bottom quark mass is not physically present, challenging previous assumptions in dark matter scattering models.
Findings
No pole at m_sbottom=m_chi+m_b in the gluon-neutralino amplitude.
A pole appears at m_sbottom=m_chi-m_b, related to decay thresholds.
Introducing an ad-hoc pole at m_sbottom=m_chi+m_b is unjustified.
Abstract
A resonance in the neutralino-nucleus elastic scattering cross section is usually purported when the neutralino-sbottom mass difference m_sbottom-m_chi is equal to the bottom quark mass m_b ~ 4 GeV. Such a scenario has been discussed as a viable model for light (~ 10 GeV) neutralino dark matter as explanation of possible DAMA and CoGeNT direct detection signals. Here we give physical and analytical arguments showing that the sbottom resonance may actually not be there. In particular, we show analytically that the one-loop gluon-neutralino scattering amplitude has no pole at m_sbottom=m_chi+m_b, while by analytic continuation to the regime m_sbottom<m_chi, it develops a pole at m_sbottom=m_chi-m_b. In the limit of vanishing gluon momenta, this pole corresponds to the only cut of the neutralino self-energy diagram with a quark and a squark running in the loop, when the decay process…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
