Berkeley 94 and Berkeley 96: Two Young Clusters with Different Dynamical Evolution
Antonio Jes\'us Delgado, Anlaug Amanda Djupvik, Mar\'ia Teresa Costado, and Emilio Javier Alfaro

TL;DR
This study compares two young star clusters, Berkeley 94 and Berkeley 96, revealing differences in their dynamical evolution, initial conditions, and mass segregation, supported by photometric data and numerical simulations.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed comparison of the dynamical evolution and initial conditions of these two young clusters using multi-band photometry and simulations.
Findings
Berkeley 94 formed under supervirial conditions, following warm collapse.
Berkeley 96 formed with subvirial conditions, following cold collapse.
Both clusters show mass segregation consistent with their dynamical histories.
Abstract
We have performed multiband UBVRcIcJHKs photometry of two young clusters located at large Galactocentric distances in the direction of the Perseus spiral arm. The obtained distances and colour excesses amount to 3.9+-0.11 kpc, E(B-V)=0.62+-0.05 for Berkeley 94, and 4.3+-0.15 kpc, E(B-V)=0.58+-0.06 for Berkeley 96. The respective ages, as measured from the comparison of the upper colour-magnitude diagrams to model isochrones, amount to LogAge(yr)=7.5+-0.07, and 7.0+-0.07, respectively. A sequence of optical PMS members is proposed in both clusters. In addition, samples of objects showing (H-Ks) excess are found. Part of these are suggested to be PMS cluster members of lower mass than the optical candidates. The spatial distribution of these sources, the comparison to galactic models and to the expected number of contaminating distant red galaxies, and the spectral energy distribution in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
