On the Accuracy of van der Waals Inclusive Density-Functional Theory Exchange-Correlation Functionals for Ice at Ambient and High Pressures
Biswajit Santra, Ji\v{r}\'i Klime\v{s}, Alexandre Tkatchenko, Dario, Alf\`e, Ben Slater, Angelos Michaelides, Roberto Car, and Matthias Scheffler

TL;DR
This study evaluates the accuracy of various van der Waals inclusive density-functional theory exchange-correlation functionals in modeling ice phases at ambient and high pressures, highlighting improvements and remaining discrepancies.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive comparison of vdW-inclusive DFT functionals for ice, emphasizing their strengths and limitations in predicting phase energies and transition pressures.
Findings
vdW methods improve high-pressure phase predictions
discrepancies remain in cohesive properties
certain phases are absent from the phase diagram
Abstract
Density-functional theory (DFT) has been widely used to study water and ice for at least 20 years. However, the reliability of different DFT exchange-correlation (xc) functionals for water remains a matter of considerable debate. This is particularly true in light of the recent development of DFT based methods that account for van der Waals (vdW) dispersion forces. Here, we report a detailed study with several xc functionals (semi-local, hybrid, and vdW inclusive approaches) on ice Ih and six proton ordered phases of ice. Consistent with our previous study [Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 185701 (2011)] which showed that vdW forces become increasingly important at high pressures, we find here that all vdW inclusive methods considered improve the relative energies and transition pressures of the high-pressure ice phases compared to those obtained with semi-local or hybrid xc functionals. However,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
