The [O III] Nebula of the Merger Remnant NGC 7252: A Likely Faint Ionization Echo
Francois Schweizer (1), Patrick Seitzer (2), Daniel D. Kelson (1),, Edward V. Villanueva (1), Gregory L. Walth (3) ((1) Carnegie Observatories,, (2) University of Michigan, (3) Steward Observatory)

TL;DR
This paper reports the discovery of a faint ionization echo in NGC 7252, indicating recent but now diminished AGN activity, with the nebula resembling Hanny's Voorwerp but at lower luminosity.
Contribution
It presents the first detection of a low-luminosity ionization echo in a merger remnant, linking it to episodic AGN activity and expanding the understanding of AGN feedback in galaxy evolution.
Findings
The nebula's [O III] luminosity is 1.4x10^40 erg/s.
No current AGN activity detected in X-ray or radio.
The nebula is likely a faint ionization echo from past AGN activity.
Abstract
We present images and spectra of a ~10 kpc-sized emission-line nebulosity discovered in the prototypical merger remnant NGC 7252 and dubbed the `[O III] nebula' because of its dominant [O III]_5007 line. This nebula seems to yield the first sign of episodic AGN activity still occurring in the remnant, ~220 Myr after the coalescence of two gas-rich galaxies. Its location and kinematics suggest it belongs to a stream of tidal-tail gas falling back into the remnant. Its integrated [O III]_5007 luminosity is 1.4x10^40 erg/s, and its spectrum features some high-excitation lines, including He II_4686. In diagnostic line- ratio diagrams, the nebula lies in the domain of Seyfert galaxies, suggesting that it is photoionized by a source with a power-law spectrum. Yet, a search for AGN activity in NGC 7252 from X-rays to radio wavelengths yields no detection, with the most stringent upper limit…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
