Are Lagrangian stochastic models at odds with statistical theories of relative dispersion?
Alberto Maurizi

TL;DR
This paper compares Lagrangian stochastic models with statistical theories of turbulent relative dispersion, finding perfect agreement regarding turbulence constants and addressing previous concerns about their consistency.
Contribution
It provides a direct comparison showing that stochastic and statistical models are consistent in their dependence on turbulence constants.
Findings
Models are in perfect agreement on turbulence constants
Addresses and resolves concerns about model consistency
Clarifies the relationship between stochastic and statistical approaches
Abstract
In an article on statistical modelling of turbulent relative dispersion, Franzese & Cassiani (2007, p. 402) commented on Lagrangian stochastic models and reported some concern about the consistency between statisti- cal and stochastic modelling of turbulent dispersion. In this short article, comparison of the two approaches is performed. As far as the dependence of models from turbulence constants is concerned, the two theoretical ap- proaches are found to be in perfect agreement eliminating every possible concern.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStatistical Methods and Bayesian Inference · Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
