A direct measurement of the linear bias of mid-infrared-selected quasars at z~1 using cosmic microwave background lensing
J. E. Geach (Hertfordshire), R. C. Hickox (Dartmouth), L. E. Bleem, (Chicago), M. Brodwin (UMKC), G. P. Holder (McGill), K. A. Aird, B. A., Benson, S. Bhattacharya, J. E. Carlstrom, C. L. Chang, H-M. Cho, T. M., Crawford, A. T. Crites, T. de Haan, M. A. Dobbs, J. Dudley

TL;DR
This study directly measures the linear bias of mid-infrared-selected quasars at redshift ~1 using cosmic microwave background lensing, finding that obscured and unobscured quasars trace matter similarly, which informs quasar evolution models.
Contribution
It provides the first direct measurement of quasar bias at z~1 through CMB lensing, confirming that obscured and unobscured quasars have similar clustering properties.
Findings
Bias of quasars measured as 1.67±0.24
Excellent agreement between SPT and Planck lensing maps
Obscured and unobscured quasars trace matter similarly
Abstract
We measure the cross-power spectrum of the projected mass density as traced by the convergence of the cosmic microwave background lensing field from the South Pole Telescope (SPT) and a sample of Type 1 and 2 (unobscured and obscured) quasars at z~1 selected with the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer, over 2500 deg^2. The cross-power spectrum is detected at ~7-sigma, and we measure a linear bias b=1.67+/-0.24, consistent with clustering analyses. Using an independent lensing map, derived from Planck observations, to measure the cross-spectrum, we find excellent agreement with the SPT analysis. The bias of the combined sample of Type 1 and 2 quasars determined in this work is similar to that previously determined for Type 1 quasars alone; we conclude that that obscured and unobscured quasars must trace the matter field in a similar way. This result has implications for our…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
