Science and Philosophy: A Love-Hate Relationship
Sebastian De Haro

TL;DR
This paper explores the complex relationship between science and philosophy, arguing that philosophy is essential for scientific progress and proposing ways they can mutually benefit each other.
Contribution
It challenges anti-philosophical arguments and demonstrates the ongoing relevance of philosophy to scientific development, especially through historical and conceptual analysis.
Findings
Philosophy is necessary for scientific paradigms.
Historical examples like quantum mechanics show philosophy's ongoing role.
Science and philosophy can have mutual synergy.
Abstract
In this paper I review the problematic relationship between science and philosophy; in particular, I will address the question of whether science needs philosophy, and I will offer some positive perspectives that should be helpful in developing a synergetic relationship between the two. I will review three lines of reasoning often employed in arguing that philosophy is useless for science: a) philosophy's death diagnosis ('philosophy is dead'); b) the historic-agnostic argument/challenge "show me examples where philosophy has been useful for science, for I don't know of any"; c) the division of property argument (or: philosophy and science have different subject matters, therefore philosophy is useless for science). These arguments will be countered with three contentions to the effect that the natural sciences need philosophy. I will: a) point to the fallacy of anti-philosophicalism…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
