Comparing various regression methods on ensemble strategies in differential evolution
Iztok Fister Jr., Iztok Fister, Janez Brest

TL;DR
This paper explores using various regression models to predict the most effective differential evolution strategy during optimization, demonstrating that random forest regression significantly improves performance on benchmark functions.
Contribution
It introduces a novel approach of applying regression models to dynamically select differential evolution strategies, enhancing optimization efficiency.
Findings
Random forest regression outperforms other methods in strategy prediction.
The proposed method improves optimization results on benchmark functions.
Dynamic strategy selection adapts better to problem characteristics.
Abstract
Differential evolution possesses a multitude of various strategies for generating new trial solutions. Unfortunately, the best strategy is not known in advance. Moreover, this strategy usually depends on the problem to be solved. This paper suggests using various regression methods (like random forest, extremely randomized trees, gradient boosting, decision trees, and a generalized linear model) on ensemble strategies in differential evolution algorithm by predicting the best differential evolution strategy during the run. Comparing the preliminary results of this algorithm by optimizing a suite of five well-known functions from literature, it was shown that using the random forest regression method substantially outperformed the results of the other regression methods.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMetaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research · Evolutionary Algorithms and Applications · Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
