Revisiting the Merit-Order Effect of Renewable Energy Sources
Marcus Hildmann, Andreas Ulbig, G\"oran Andersson

TL;DR
This paper examines the impact of renewable energy sources on energy markets, arguing that market distortions, not the renewable feed-in itself, threaten market stability, and suggests regulatory adjustments to maintain market functionality.
Contribution
It demonstrates that market distortions over-amplify the merit-order effect of RES and proposes regulatory reforms to ensure market stability with high RES integration.
Findings
Market distortions over-amplify RES merit-order effect
Regulatory adjustments can maintain market stability
High RES feed-in does not inherently cause market failure
Abstract
An on-going debate in the energy economics and power market community has raised the question if energy-only power markets are increasingly failing due to growing feed-in shares from subsidized renewable energy sources (RES). The short answer to this is: No, they are not failing. Energy-based power markets are, however, facing several market distortions, namely from the gap between the electricity volume traded at day-ahead markets versus the overall electricity consumption as well as the (wrong) regulatory assumption that variable RES generation, i.e., wind and photovoltaic (PV), truly have zero marginal operation costs. In this paper we show that both effects over-amplify the well-known merit-order effect of RES power feed-in beyond a level that is explainable by underlying physical realities, i.e., thermal power plants being willing to accept negative electricity prices to be able to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsElectric Power System Optimization · Climate Change Policy and Economics · Smart Grid Energy Management
