On the gravitational redshift
Klaus Wilhelm, Bhola N. Dwivedi

TL;DR
This paper revisits the gravitational redshift, emphasizing the small ratio of gravitational to electrostatic forces in atoms, and proposes a two-step process explanation based on energy and momentum conservation, challenging geometric interpretations.
Contribution
It introduces a novel two-step process model for gravitational redshift that does not rely on geometric descriptions and highlights the importance of force ratios.
Findings
The gravitational to electrostatic force ratio in atoms is extremely small (~10^{-21}).
A two-step process explains the redshift consistent with energy and momentum conservation.
The gravitational field influences photon emission, not atomic transitions.
Abstract
The study of the gravitational redshift\,---\,a relative wavelength increase of was predicted for solar radiation by Einstein in 1908\,---\,is still an important subject in modern physics. In a dispute whether or not atom interferometry experiments can be employed for gravitational redshift measurements, two research teams have recently disagreed on the physical cause of the shift. Regardless of any discussion on the interferometer aspect\,---\,we find that both groups of authors miss the important point that the ratio of gravitational to the electrostatic forces is generally very small. For instance, the gravitational force acting on an electron in a hydrogen atom situated in the Sun's photosphere to the electrostatic force between the proton and the electron is approximately . A comparison of this ratio with the predicted and observed…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
