Topological Performance Measures as Surrogates for Physical Flow Models for Risk and Vulnerability Analysis for Electric Power Systems
Sarah LaRocca, Jonas Johansson, Henrik Hassel, Seth Guikema

TL;DR
This paper compares simple topological models and complex physical flow models for risk analysis in electric power systems, evaluating if simplified measures can serve as effective surrogates to improve analysis efficiency.
Contribution
It introduces a classification of models from topological to physical flow-based and assesses their tradeoffs, proposing statistical methods to combine simpler models as surrogates.
Findings
Simplified topological measures can approximate physical flow models with acceptable accuracy.
Combining multiple topological measures improves surrogate model performance.
Using surrogates reduces computational time significantly for large-scale risk analysis.
Abstract
Critical infrastructure systems must be both robust and resilient in order to ensure the functioning of society. To improve the performance of such systems, we often use risk and vulnerability analysis to find and address system weaknesses. A critical component of such analyses is the ability to accurately determine the negative consequences of various types of failures in the system. Numerous mathematical and simulation models exist which can be used to this end. However, there are relatively few studies comparing the implications of using different modeling approaches in the context of comprehensive risk analysis of critical infrastructures. Thus in this paper, we suggest a classification of these models, which span from simple topologically-oriented models to advanced physical flow-based models. Here, we focus on electric power systems and present a study aimed at understanding the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
