Exploring the Systematic Uncertainties of Type Ia Supernovae as Cosmological Probes
Shuang Wang, and Yun Wang

TL;DR
This study investigates the systematic uncertainties in using Type Ia supernovae as cosmological tools, focusing on the evolution of key parameters and the impact of flux-averaging on distance measurements.
Contribution
It provides new insights into the redshift evolution of supernova parameters and demonstrates how flux-averaging mitigates systematic effects in cosmological analyses.
Findings
No evidence for evolution of the stretch-luminosity parameter $oldsymbol{ extit{ extalpha}}$ with redshift.
The color-luminosity parameter $oldsymbol{ extbeta}$ varies with redshift when not flux-averaged, but remains constant when flux-averaged.
Flux-averaging significantly influences the derived distance-redshift relation.
Abstract
We explore the systematic uncertainties of using Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) as cosmological probes, using the Supernova Legacy Survey Three Year data (SNLS3). We focus on studying the possible evolution of the stretch-luminosity parameter and the color-luminosity parameter , by allowing and to be function of redshift, . We find no evidence for the redshift evolution of . We find that without flux-averaging SNe, is consistent with being a constant when only statistical uncertainties are included, but it increases significantly with when systematic uncertainties are also included. The evolution of becomes marginal when all the SNe are flux-averaged, and is consistent with being a constant when only SNe at are flux-averaged. Our results are insensitive to the lightcurve fitter used to derive the SNLS3…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
