Evaluation of imaging protocol for ECT based on CS image reconstruction algorithm
Xiaolin Zhou, Minkai Yun, Xuexiang Cao, Shuangquan Liu, Lu Wang,, Xianchao Huang, Long Wei

TL;DR
This paper evaluates imaging protocols for ECT, demonstrating that acquisition counts are more critical than sampling angles, and introduces a compressed sensing-based iterative reconstruction algorithm that reduces radiopharmaceutical dose while maintaining image quality.
Contribution
The study develops a novel iterative reconstruction algorithm based on compressed sensing for limited-view, low-dose ECT imaging, improving image quality with reduced radiopharmaceutical dose.
Findings
Acquisition counts impact image quality more than sampling angles.
The new algorithm achieves comparable or better image quality with half the dose.
Limited-view reconstruction artifacts are reduced using total variation regularization.
Abstract
SPECT (Single-photon Emission Computerized Tomography) and PET (Positron Emission Tomography) are essential medical imaging tools, for which the sampling angle number, scan time should be chosen carefully to compromise between image quality and the radiopharmaceutical dose. In this study, the image quality of different acquisition protocol was evaluated via varied angle number and count number per angle with Monte Carlo simulation data. It was shown that when similar imaging counts were used, the factor of acquisition counts was more important than that of the sampling number in ECT (Emission Computerized Tomography). To further reduce the activity requirement and the scan duration, an iterative image reconstruction algorithm for limited-view and low-dose tomography based on compressed sensing theory has been developed. The total variation regulation was added in the reconstruction…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
