Optical Interferometry of early-type stars with PAVO@CHARA. I. Fundamental stellar properties
V. Maestro, X. Che, D. Huber, M. J. Ireland, J. D. Monnier, T. R., White, Y. Kok, J. G. Robertson, G. H. Schaefer, T. A. Ten Brummelaar, P. G., Tuthill

TL;DR
This study uses optical interferometry to measure fundamental properties of early-type stars, validating temperature relations and highlighting discrepancies in mass estimates, thereby improving stellar characterization methods.
Contribution
The paper provides direct angular diameter measurements for early-type stars, refines temperature relations, and compares different mass estimation methods, revealing potential issues in stellar parameter determinations.
Findings
Angular diameters determined with 2.3% precision.
Effective temperatures agree within 3% with spectroscopic estimates.
Discrepancy found between isochrone and gravity mass for star γ Lyr.
Abstract
We present interferometric observations of 7 main-sequence and 3 giant stars with spectral types from B2 to F6 using the PAVO beam combiner at the CHARA array. We have directly determined the angular diameters for these objects with an average precision of 2.3%. We have also computed bolometric fluxes using available photometry in the visible and infrared wavelengths, as well as space-based ultraviolet spectroscopy. Combined with precise \textit{Hipparcos} parallaxes, we have derived a set of fundamental stellar properties including linear radius, luminosity and effective temperature. Fitting the latter to computed isochrone models, we have inferred masses and ages of the stars. The effective temperatures obtained are in good agreement (at a 3% level) with nearly-independent temperature estimations from spectroscopy. They validate recent sixth-order polynomial (B-V)-…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
