How well do we know the Halo Mass Function?
Steven Murray, Chris Power, Aaron Robotham

TL;DR
This paper reviews how the accuracy of the dark matter halo mass function as a cosmological probe has improved over the last decade, highlighting current limitations and future prospects for distinguishing dark matter models.
Contribution
It analyzes the evolution of uncertainties in the halo mass function due to cosmological parameter measurements and discusses the implications for dark matter and dark energy research.
Findings
Uncertainty in the HMF has decreased significantly since WMAP3.
The reduction in uncertainty is slowing, limited by _8 normalization.
Current HMF accuracy is comparable to the scatter in fitting functions.
Abstract
The parameters governing the standard \Lambda Cold Dark Matter cosmological model have been constrained with unprecedented accuracy by precise measurements of the cosmic microwave background by the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) and Planck satellites. Each new data release has refined further our knowledge of quantities -- such as the matter density parameter \Omega_M -- that are imprinted on the dark matter halo mass function (HMF), a powerful probe of dark matter and dark energy models. In this letter we trace how changes in the cosmological parameters over the last decade have influenced uncertainty in our knowledge of the HMF. We show that this uncertainty has reduced significantly since the 3rd WMAP data release, but the rate of this reduction is slowing. This is limited by uncertainty in the normalisation \sigma_8, whose influence is most pronounced at the high mass…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
