Preference for meat is not innate in dogs

TL;DR

This study shows that dogs' preference for meat is learned rather than innate, with pups not showing a natural preference and relying on learned behaviors from their environment and maternal cues.

Contribution

It demonstrates that meat preference in dogs is acquired through learning and cultural transmission, not an innate trait inherited from their carnivorous ancestors.

Findings

Adults prefer meat, pups do not show preference.

Pups readily eat degraded protein.

Meat preference is learned, not innate.

Abstract

Indian free ranging dogs live in a carbohydrate rich environment as scavengers in and around human settlements. They rarely hunt and consequently do not encounter rich sources of protein. Instead they have adapted to a diet of primarily carbohydrates. As descendants of the exclusively carnivorous wolves, they are subjected to the evolutionary load of a physiological demand for proteins. To meet their protein needs they resort to a thumb rule, if it smells like meat, eat it. Pups face high competition from group and non group members and are in a phase of rapid growth with high protein demands. Following the thumb rule, then they can acquire more protein at the cost of increased competition and reduced supplementary non protein nutrition. However, if the mother supplements their diet with protein rich regurgitates and milk, then the pups can benefit by being generalists. Using a choice test in the field we show that while adults have a clear preference for meat, pups have no such preference, and they even eat degraded protein eagerly. Thus the thumb rule used by adult dogs for efficient scavenging is not innate, and needs to be learned. The thumb rule might be acquired by cultural transmission, through exposure to meat in the regurgitate of the mother, or while accompanying her on foraging trips.