CANDELS: The correlation between galaxy morphology and star formation activity at z~2
Bomee Lee, Mauro Giavalisco, Christina C. Williams, Yicheng Guo,, Jennifer Lotz, Arjen Van der Wel, Henry C. Ferguson, S.M. Faber, Anton, Koekemoer, Norman Grogin, Dale Kocevski, Christopher J. Conselice, Stijn, Wuyts, Avishai Dekel, Jeyhan Kartaltepe, Eric F. Bell

TL;DR
This study examines the relationship between galaxy morphology and star formation activity at redshift around 2, revealing a strong correlation between galaxy type and structural features using a large, well-selected sample.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of galaxy morphology and star formation at z~2, demonstrating that the Hubble sequence was largely established by this epoch.
Findings
Star-forming galaxies exhibit diverse, disky, and clumpy morphologies.
Passive galaxies tend to be compact and spheroidal.
Morphological properties at z~2 are similar to local universe trends.
Abstract
We discuss the state of the assembly of the Hubble Sequence in the mix of bright galaxies at redshift 1.4< z \le 2.5 with a large sample of 1,671 galaxies down to H_{AB}~26, selected from the HST/ACS and WFC3 images of the GOODS--South field obtained as part of the GOODS and CANDELS observations. We investigate the relationship between the star formation properties and morphology using various parametric diagnostics, such as the Sersic light profile, Gini (G), M_{20}, Concentration (C), Asymmetry (A) and multiplicity parameters. Our sample clearly separates into massive, red and passive galaxies versus less massive, blue and star forming ones, and this dichotomy correlates very well with the galaxies' morphological properties. Star--forming galaxies show a broad variety of morphological features, including clumpy structures and bulges mixed with faint low surface brightness features,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
