Quantum Transport With Two Interacting Conduction Channels
Alexander J. White, Agostino Migliore, Michael Galperin, Abraham, Nitzan

TL;DR
This paper investigates quantum transport in a model with two interacting conduction channels, comparing full quantum calculations to approximate methods, and highlights the importance of correlations for accurate current predictions near threshold voltages.
Contribution
It introduces a detailed analysis of a two-channel transport model, comparing full quantum and mixed quantum-classical approaches, emphasizing the significance of correlations in molecular junctions.
Findings
Averaged rate approximation performs well across most voltages.
Significant deviations occur at the charging threshold of the weakly coupled level.
Correlations are crucial for accurately modeling negative differential conductance.
Abstract
The transport properties of a conduction junction model characterized by two mutually coupled channels that strongly differ in their couplings to the leads are investigated. Models of this type describe molecular redox junctions (where a level that is weakly coupled to the leads controls the molecular charge, while a strongly coupled one dominates the molecular conduction), and electron counting devices in which the current in a point contact is sensitive to the charging state of a nearby quantum dot. Here we consider the case where transport in the strongly coupled channel has to be described quantum mechanically (covering the full range between sequential tunneling and co-tunneling), while conduction through the weakly coupled channel is a sequential process that could by itself be described by a simple master equation. We compare the result of a full quantum calculation based on the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
