Advanced LIGO's ability to detect apparent violations of the cosmic censorship conjecture and the no-hair theorem through compact binary coalescence detections
Madeline Wade, Jolien D.E. Creighton, Evan Ochsner, and Alex B., Nielsen

TL;DR
This paper evaluates how well advanced LIGO can detect potential violations of fundamental black hole properties, such as the cosmic censorship conjecture and the no-hair theorem, through gravitational wave observations of binary systems.
Contribution
It introduces a Fisher matrix-based method to quantify the smallest detectable violations of these conjectures in gravitational wave data, considering physical priors and waveform corrections.
Findings
Physical priors and higher harmonics impact detection sensitivity.
Post-Newtonian corrections influence parameter measurability.
LIGO's ability to test fundamental black hole properties varies with system parameters.
Abstract
We study the ability of the advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (aLIGO) to detect apparent violations of the cosmic censorship conjecture and the no-hair theorem. The cosmic censorship conjecture, which is believed to be true in the theory of general relativity, limits the spin-to-mass-squared ratio of a Kerr black hole. The no-hair theorem, which is also believed to be true in the theory of general relativity, suggests a particular value for the tidal Love number of a non-rotating black hole. Using the Fisher matrix formalism, we examine the measurability of the spin and tidal deformability of compact binary systems involving at least one putative black hole. Using parameter measurement errors and correlations obtained from the Fisher matrix, we determine the smallest detectable violation of bounds implied by the cosmic censorship conjecture and the no-hair…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
