Bayesian methods for low-rank matrix estimation: short survey and theoretical study
Pierre Alquier

TL;DR
This paper reviews Bayesian approaches for low-rank matrix estimation, comparing them to penalization methods, and provides theoretical results showing their optimality under certain conditions.
Contribution
It offers a comprehensive survey of priors used in Bayesian low-rank estimation and proves their estimators can achieve optimality similar to penalized methods.
Findings
Bayesian estimators can attain the same optimality as penalized methods.
Different priors for low-rank matrices are systematically reviewed.
Theoretical guarantees are established for Bayesian estimators.
Abstract
The problem of low-rank matrix estimation recently received a lot of attention due to challenging applications. A lot of work has been done on rank-penalized methods and convex relaxation, both on the theoretical and applied sides. However, only a few papers considered Bayesian estimation. In this paper, we review the different type of priors considered on matrices to favour low-rank. We also prove that the obtained Bayesian estimators, under suitable assumptions, enjoys the same optimality properties as the ones based on penalization.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
