Analytical Light Curve Models of Super-Luminous Supernovae: chi^2-Minimizations of Parameter Fits
E. Chatzopoulos, J. C. Wheeler, J. Vinko, Z. L. Horvath, A. Nagy

TL;DR
This paper develops and applies semi-analytic light curve models to various super-luminous supernovae, comparing different power sources to identify the dominant mechanisms behind their extraordinary brightness.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive fitting approach for supernova light curves considering multiple power inputs and compares semi-analytic results with numerical simulations, highlighting the effectiveness of ejecta-CSM interaction.
Findings
CS shock heating fits most supernova light curves better
Ejecta-CSM interaction may explain hydrogen-deficient SLSNe
Collision with hydrogen-deficient CSM could be key in some supernovae
Abstract
We present fits of generalized semi-analytic supernova (SN) light curve (LC) models for a variety of power inputs including Ni-56 and Co-56 radioactive decay, magnetar spin-down, and forward and reverse shock heating due to supernova ejecta-circumstellar matter (CSM) interaction. We apply our models to the observed LCs of the H-rich Super Luminous Supernovae (SLSN-II) SN 2006gy, SN 2006tf, SN 2008am, SN 2008es, CSS100217, the H-poor SLSN-I SN 2005ap, SCP06F6, SN 2007bi, SN 2010gx and SN 2010kd as well as to the interacting SN 2008iy and PTF09uj. Our goal is to determine the dominant mechanism that powers the LCs of these extraordinary events and the physical conditions involved in each case. We also present a comparison of our semi-analytical results with recent results from numerical radiation hydrodynamics calculations in the particular case of SN 2006gy in order to explore the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
