The entropic lock and key of the histone code
Bradley M. Dickson, Dmitri B. Kireev

TL;DR
This paper proposes a new mechanism for multivalent histone effector binding, emphasizing the importance of modification spacing rather than tether rigidity, supported by molecular dynamics simulations.
Contribution
It introduces a model where optimal spacing of chromatin modifications pre-pays entropic costs, challenging the idea that tether rigidity is essential for multivalent binding.
Findings
Molecular dynamics simulations support the model's predictions.
Optimal spacing of modifications enhances binding efficiency.
Disordered tethers are sufficient for effective multivalent interactions.
Abstract
The intricate pattern of chemical modifications on DNA and histones, the "histone code", is considered to be a key gene regulation factor. Multivalency is seen by many as an essential instrument to transmit the "encoded" information to the transcription machinery via multi-domain effector proteins and chromatin-associated complexes. However, as examples of multivalent histone engagement accumulate, an apparent contradiction is emerging. The isolated effector domains are notably weak binders, thus it is often asserted that the entropic cost of orienting multiple domains can be "prepaid" by a rigid tether. Meanwhile, evidence suggests that the tethers are largely disordered and offer little rigidity. Here we consider a mechanism to "prepay" the entropic costs of orienting the domains for binding, not through rigidity of the tether but through the careful spacing of the modifications on…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics · Epigenetics and DNA Methylation · RNA modifications and cancer
