Measuring the Cooling of the Neutron Star in Cassiopeia A with all Chandra X-ray Observatory Detectors
K. G. Elshamouty (1), C. O. Heinke (1), G. R. Sivakoff (1), W. C. G., Ho (2), P. S. Shternin (3), D. G. Yakovlev (3), D. J. Patnaude (4), and L., David (4) ((1) University of Alberta, (2) University of Southampton, (3), Ioffe Physical Technical Institute

TL;DR
This study analyzes all available Chandra X-ray data to measure the temperature decline of the Cassiopeia A neutron star over a decade, providing insights into its cooling rate and core superfluidity.
Contribution
It offers a comprehensive reanalysis using all Chandra detectors and modes, refining the neutron star's cooling measurement with current calibrations.
Findings
Temperature decay of 2.9% over 10 years with uncertainties
Cooling rate consistent with superfluid core models
Systematic effects from supernova remnant background considered
Abstract
The thermal evolution of young neutron stars (NSs) reflects the neutrino emission properties of their cores. Heinke et al. (2010) measured a 3.6+/-0.6% decay in the surface temperature of the Cassiopeia A (Cas A) NS between 2000 and 2009, using archival data from the Chandra X-ray Observatory ACIS-S detector in Graded mode. Page et al. (2011) and Shternin et al. (2011) attributed this decay to enhanced neutrino emission from a superfluid neutron transition in the core. Here we test this decline, combining analysis of the Cas A NS using all Chandra X-ray detectors and modes (HRC-S, HRC-I, ACIS-I, ACIS-S in Faint mode, and ACIS-S in Graded mode) and adding a 2012 May ACIS-S Graded mode observation, using the most current calibrations (CALDB 4.5.5.1). We measure the temperature changes from each detector separately and test for systematic effects due to the nearby filaments of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
