The comfortable driving model revisited: Traffic phases and phase transitions
Florian Knorr, Michael Schreckenberg

TL;DR
This study revisits a microscopic traffic model to evaluate its ability to reproduce traffic phases and transitions, comparing results with empirical data and Kerner's three-phase traffic theory.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the model can qualitatively reproduce three traffic phases and transition patterns, using a rule-based classification method, despite theoretical discrepancies.
Findings
The model reproduces free flow, synchronized traffic, and wide moving jams.
Transitions from free flow to jams often involve an intermediate synchronized phase.
The F->S transition is more likely than a direct F->J transition.
Abstract
We study the spatiotemporal patterns resulting from different boundary conditions for a microscopic traffic model and contrast it with empirical results. By evaluating the time series of local measurements, the local traffic states are assigned to the different traffic phases of Kerner's three-phase traffic theory. For this classification we use the rule-based FOTO-method, which provides `hard' rules for this assignment. Using this approach, our analysis shows that the model is indeed able to reproduce three qualitatively different traffic phases: free flow (F), synchronized traffic (S), and wide moving jams (J). In addition, we investigate the likelihood of transitions between the three traffic phases. We show that a transition from free flow (F) to a wide moving jam (J) often involves an intermediate transition; first from free flow F to synchronized flow S and then from synchronized…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
