Validation of GEANT4 Monte Carlo Models with a Highly Granular Scintillator-Steel Hadron Calorimeter
C.Adloff, J.Blaha, J.-J.Blaising, C.Drancourt, A.Espargili\`ere, R., Gaglione, N.Geffroy, Y.Karyotakis, J.Prast, G.Vouters, K. Francis, J.Repond,, J.Schlereth, J.Smith, L.Xia, E.Baldolemar, J. Li, S. T.Park, M.Sosebee,, A.P.White, J.Yu, T.Buanes, G.Eigen, Y.Mikami, N.K.Watson

TL;DR
This study validates GEANT4 Monte Carlo models by comparing simulations with data from a highly granular scintillator-steel hadron calorimeter, demonstrating the models' accuracy in reproducing shower development.
Contribution
It provides a detailed comparison of GEANT4 physics lists against experimental data from a finely segmented calorimeter, highlighting their performance in modeling hadronic showers.
Findings
GEANT4 models accurately reproduce the longitudinal shower development.
Lateral shower profiles are well modeled by selected physics lists.
Global calorimeter response matches experimental data within uncertainties.
Abstract
Calorimeters with a high granularity are a fundamental requirement of the Particle Flow paradigm. This paper focuses on the prototype of a hadron calorimeter with analog readout, consisting of thirty-eight scintillator layers alternating with steel absorber planes. The scintillator plates are finely segmented into tiles individually read out via Silicon Photomultipliers. The presented results are based on data collected with pion beams in the energy range from 8GeV to 100GeV. The fine segmentation of the sensitive layers and the high sampling frequency allow for an excellent reconstruction of the spatial development of hadronic showers. A comparison between data and Monte Carlo simulations is presented, concerning both the longitudinal and lateral development of hadronic showers and the global response of the calorimeter. The performance of several GEANT4 physics lists with respect to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
