UV-Continuum Slopes of >4000 z~4-8 Galaxies from the HUDF/XDF, HUDF09, ERS, CANDELS-South, and CANDELS-North Fields
R. J. Bouwens, G. D. Illingworth, P. A. Oesch, I. Labbe, P.G. van, Dokkum, M. Trenti, M. Franx, R. Smit, V. Gonzalez, D. Magee

TL;DR
This study measures the UV-continuum slopes of over 4000 high-redshift galaxies from z~4-8, correcting systematic biases to provide consistent results that inform galaxy evolution and dust content in the early universe.
Contribution
Developed a new robust technique for measuring UV slopes that corrects previous systematic biases, leading to consistent results across multiple datasets and studies.
Findings
Mean beta at z~4-7 is around -2.2 to -2.3.
Beta shows mild luminosity dependence, asymptoting at faint magnitudes.
Results suggest low dust extinction in high-redshift galaxies.
Abstract
We measure the UV-continuum slope beta for over 4000 high-redshift galaxies over a wide range of redshifts z~4-8 and luminosities from the HST HUDF/XDF, HUDF09-1, HUDF09-2, ERS, CANDELS-N, and CANDELS-S data sets. Our new beta results reach very faint levels at z~4 (-15.5 mag: 0.006 L*(z=3)), z~5 (-16.5 mag: 0.014L*(z=3)), and z~6 and z~7 (-17 mag: 0.025 L*(z=3)). Inconsistencies between previous studies led us to conduct a comprehensive review of systematic errors and develop a new technique for measuring beta that is robust against biases that arise from the impact of noise. We demonstrate, by object-by-object comparisons, that all previous studies, including our own and those done on the latest HUDF12 dataset, suffer from small systematic errors in beta. We find that after correcting for the systematic errors (typically d(beta) ~0.1-0.2) all beta results at z~7 from different groups…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
