Identification and rejection of scattered neutrons in AGATA
M. \c{S}enyi\u{g}it, A. Ata\c{c}, S. Akkoyun, A. Ka\c{s}ka\c{s}, D., Bazzacco, J. Nyberg, F. Recchia, S. Brambilla, F. Camera, F.C.L. Crespi, E., Farnea, A. Giaz, A. Gottardo, R. Kempley, J. Ljungvall, D. Mengoni, C., Michelagnoli, B. Million, M. Palacz, L. Pellegri, S. Riboldi

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that gamma-ray tracking in AGATA detectors can effectively discriminate against neutrons, improving the accuracy of gamma-ray measurements in nuclear physics experiments.
Contribution
The study introduces neutron rejection techniques in AGATA using gamma-ray tracking combined with time-of-flight data, validated by experimental and simulation results.
Findings
Standard gamma-ray tracking effectively rejects most neutron-induced events.
Additional rejection achieved by applying conditions on interaction parameters.
Experimental results align well with Geant4 simulations.
Abstract
Gamma rays and neutrons, emitted following spontaneous fission of 252Cf, were measured in an AGATA experiment performed at INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro in Italy. The setup consisted of four AGATA triple cluster detectors (12 36-fold segmented high-purity germanium crystals), placed at a distance of 50 cm from the source, and 16 HELENA BaF2 detectors. The aim of the experiment was to study the interaction of neutrons in the segmented high-purity germanium detectors of AGATA and to investigate the possibility to discriminate neutrons and gamma rays with the gamma-ray tracking technique. The BaF2 detectors were used for a time-of-flight measurement, which gave an independent discrimination of neutrons and gamma rays and which was used to optimise the gamma-ray tracking-based neutron rejection methods. It was found that standard gamma-ray tracking, without any additional neutron…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
