Is bimodality a sufficient condition for a first order phase transition existence?
K. A. Bugaev, A. I. Ivanytskyi, V. V. Sagun, D. R. Oliinychenko

TL;DR
This paper presents counterexamples showing bimodality is not a definitive indicator of first order phase transitions, challenging common assumptions in statistical physics and nuclear matter models.
Contribution
It introduces an exactly solvable model demonstrating bimodal distributions can occur without phase transitions, both in finite and infinite systems.
Findings
Bimodal distributions appear without phase transitions in infinite systems at supercritical temperatures.
Bimodal fragment distributions occur in finite volume gaseous phases.
The model aligns with thermodynamic principles and avoids non-monotonic isotherms.
Abstract
Here we present two explicit counterexamples to the widely spread beliefs about an exclusive role of bimodality as the first order phase transition signal. On the basis of an exactly solvable statistical model generalizing the statistical multifragmentation model we demonstrate that the bimodal distributions can naturally appear both in infinite and in finite systems without a phase transition. In the first counterexample a bimodal distribution appears in an infinite system at the supercritical temperatures due to the negative values of the surface tension coefficient. In the second counterexample we explicitly demonstrate that a bimodal fragment distribution appears in a finite volume analog of a gaseous phase. In contrast to the statistical multifragmentation model, the developed statistical model corresponds to the compressible nuclear liquid with the tricritical endpoint located at…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
