Testing the validity of the single-spin approximation in inspiral-merger-ringdown waveforms
Michael P\"urrer, Mark Hannam, P. Ajith, Sascha Husa

TL;DR
This study evaluates the accuracy of single-spin waveform models in gravitational-wave data analysis, finding they are adequate for low-mass binaries but introduce significant biases in high-mass cases, affecting spin measurements.
Contribution
The paper systematically assesses the biases introduced by single-spin approximations in waveform models across different binary mass ranges.
Findings
Bias in low-mass binaries is smaller than parameter uncertainties at SNRs up to 50.
Bias in mass ratio and spin measurement increases for higher-mass binaries.
Potential to measure both black-hole spins accurately in intermediate-mass binaries.
Abstract
Gravitational-wave signals from black-hole binaries with non-precessing spins are described by four parameters -- each black hole's mass and spin. It has been shown that the dominant spin effects can be modeled by a \emph{single} spin parameter, leading to the development of several \emph{three-parameter} waveform models. Previous studies indicate that these models should be adequate for gravitational-wave detection. In this paper we focus on the systematic biases that would result from using them to estimate binary parameters, and consider a one-parameter family of configurations at one choice of mass ratio and effective single spin. We find that for low-mass binaries within that family of configurations, where the observable waveform is dominated by the inspiral, the systematic bias in all physical parameters is smaller than the parameter uncertainty due to degeneracies between the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
