Measuring nebular temperatures: the effect of new collision strengths with equilibrium and kappa-distributed electron energies
David C. Nicholls, Michael A. Dopita, Ralph S. Sutherland, Lisa J., Kewley, and Ethan Palay

TL;DR
This paper introduces new tools for analyzing nebular spectra, enabling more accurate temperature and metallicity measurements by incorporating recent atomic data and potential non-equilibrium electron energy distributions.
Contribution
It presents a simple method for calculating equilibrium electron temperatures using updated atomic data and adapts existing methods to account for non-equilibrium '{ta}' electron energy distributions.
Findings
Older atomic data overestimate electron temperatures.
Inclusion of '{ta}' distributions affects temperature diagnostics.
Tools improve consistency in nebular temperature and abundance measurements.
Abstract
In this paper we develop tools for observers to use when analysing nebular spectra for temperatures and metallicities, with two goals: to present a new, simple method to calculate equilibrium electron temperatures for collisionally excited line flux ratios, using the latest atomic data; and to adapt current methods to include the effects of possible non-equilibrium '{\kappa}' electron energy distributions. Adopting recent collision strength data for [O iii], [S iii], [O ii], [S ii], and [N ii], we find that existing methods based on older atomic data seriously overestimate the electron temperatures, even when considering purely Maxwellian statistics. If {\kappa} distributions exist in H ii regions and planetary nebulae as they do in solar system plasmas, it is important to investigate the observational consequences. This paper continues our previous work on the {\kappa} distribution…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
