Qualified Trust, not Surveillance, is the Basis of a Stable Society
Dirk Helbing

TL;DR
This paper critically examines the reliance on surveillance for societal stability, arguing that trust rather than surveillance should underpin a peaceful and just society, and explores alternative approaches.
Contribution
It challenges the prevailing notion that surveillance is essential for societal stability and proposes trust-based frameworks as viable alternatives.
Findings
Surveillance often undermines trust in society.
Trust-based approaches can enhance societal stability.
Current surveillance practices pose ethical and social risks.
Abstract
Peaceful citizens and hard-working taxpayers are under government surveillance. Confidential communication of journalists is intercepted. Civilians are killed by drones, without a chance to prove their innocence. How could it come that far? And what are the alternatives?
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
