A Curious Explanation of Some Cosmological Phenomena
Ram Gopal Vishwakarma

TL;DR
This paper explores how the Milne model, a phenomenological cosmological theory, can explain observations without dark sectors, potentially offering insights into developing a final theory of gravitation.
Contribution
It highlights unnoticed coincidences suggesting that a theory excluding the energy-stress tensor from dynamics could resolve key cosmological issues.
Findings
Milne model explains observations without dark matter or dark energy.
The model avoids horizon, flatness, and cosmological constant problems.
Insights from coincidences may guide the development of a final gravitational theory.
Abstract
While observational cosmology has shown tremendous growth over the last decade, deep mysteries continue to haunt our theoretical understanding of the ingredients of the concordance cosmological model, which are mainly `dark'. More than 95 percent of the content of the energy-stress tensor has to be in the form of inflaton, dark matter and dark energy, which do not have any non-gravitational or laboratory evidence and remain unidentified. Moreover, the dark energy poses a serious confrontation between fundamental physics and cosmology. This makes a strong case to discover alternative theories which do not require the dark sectors of the standard approach to explain the observations. In the present situation, it would be important to gain insight about the requirements of the `would be' final theory from all possible means. In this context, the present paper highlights some, hitherto…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
