Revisiting XENON100's Constraints (and Signals?) For Low-Mass Dark Matter
Dan Hooper

TL;DR
This paper reexamines XENON100's constraints on low-mass dark matter, considering uncertainties, and suggests the observed events could be consistent with signals from dark matter particles in the 7-10 GeV range, predicting potential detection by LUX.
Contribution
It introduces a revised analysis of XENON100 data, accounting for uncertainties, and proposes that observed events may be compatible with low-mass dark matter signals, challenging previous constraints.
Findings
XENON100's two nuclear recoil events could originate from low-mass dark matter.
Adjusting scintillation efficiency and signal suppression makes dark matter interpretation plausible.
LUX should observe dark matter signals at a rate of 3-24 events per month.
Abstract
Although observations made with the CoGeNT and CDMS experiments have been interpreted as possible signals of low-mass (~7-10 GeV) dark matter particles, constraints from the XENON100 collaboration appear to be incompatible with this hypothesis, at least at face value. In this paper, we revisit XENON100's constraint on dark matter in this mass range, and consider how various uncertainties and assumptions made might alter this conclusion. We also note that while XENON100's two nuclear recoil candidates each exhibit very low ratios of ionization-to-scintillation signals, making them difficult to attribute to known electronic or neutron backgrounds, they are consistent with originating from dark matter particles in the mass range favored by CoGeNT and CDMS. We argue that with lower, but not implausible, values for the relative scintillation efficiency of liquid xenon (L_eff), and the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
