Cosmological constant and vacuum energy: old and new ideas
Joan Sola

TL;DR
This paper reviews the longstanding cosmological constant problem, emphasizing the discrepancy between theoretical vacuum energy predictions and observations, especially in light of recent Higgs boson discoveries, and explores old and new ideas focused on vacuum energy and its potential running.
Contribution
It provides a pedagogical overview of the cosmological constant problem, highlighting the significance of vacuum energy and recent developments related to the Higgs boson.
Findings
The discrepancy between vacuum energy predictions and observed cosmological constant is about 55 orders of magnitude.
Recent Higgs boson discovery relates to the tangible concept of vacuum energy in phenomenology.
The paper emphasizes the importance of the original vacuum energy notion over dark energy models.
Abstract
The cosmological constant (CC) term in Einstein's equations, Lambda, was first associated to the idea of vacuum energy density. Notwithstanding, it is well-known that there is a huge, in fact appalling, discrepancy between the theoretical prediction and the observed value picked from the modern cosmological data. This is the famous, and extremely difficult, "CC problem". Paradoxically, the recent observation at the CERN Large Hadron Collider of a Higgs-like particle, should actually be considered ambivalent: on the one hand it appears as a likely great triumph of particle physics, but on the other hand it wide opens Pandora's box of the cosmological uproar, for it may provide (alas!) the experimental certification of the existence of the electroweak (EW) vacuum energy, and thus of the intriguing reality of the CC problem. Even if only counting on this contribution to the inventory of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
