Lyman break and UV-selected galaxies at z ~ 1: II. PACS-100um/160um FIR detections
I. Oteo, G. Magdis, \'A. Bongiovanni, A.M. P\'erez-Garc\'ia, J. Cepa,, B. Cedr\'es, A. Ederoclite, M. S\'anchez-Portal, J. A. L. Aguerri, E. J., Alfaro, B. Altieri, P. Andreani, T. Aparicio-Villegas, H. Aussel, N., Ben\'itez, S. Berta, T. Broadhurst, J. Cabrera-Ca\~no

TL;DR
This study detects and analyzes 42 Lyman break galaxies at z ~ 1 in the FIR, revealing their dust content, star formation, and morphological properties, and comparing their evolution with higher redshift counterparts.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed FIR detection and analysis of LBGs at z ~ 1, highlighting their dust, star formation, and morphological characteristics in the context of galaxy evolution.
Findings
PACS-detected LBGs are larger, more massive, dustier, and UV-brighter than undetected ones.
All PACS-detected LBGs at z ~ 1 are LIRGs, but none are ULIRGs, indicating evolution with cosmic time.
Dust attenuation estimates from UV slope are effective for total SFR at z ~ 1, but overestimate for younger galaxies.
Abstract
We report the PACS-100um/160um detections of a sample of 42 GALEX-selected and FIR-detected Lyman break galaxies (LBGs) at z ~ 1 located in the COSMOS field and analyze their ultra-violet (UV) to far-infrared (FIR) properties. The detection of these LBGs in the FIR indicates that they have a dust content high enough so that its emission can be directly detected. According to a spectral energy distribution (SED) fitting with stellar population templates to their UV-to-near-IR observed photometry, PACS-detected LBGs tend to be bigger, more massive, dustier, redder in the UV continuum, and UV-brighter than PACS-undetected LBGs. PACS-detected LBGs at z ~ 1 are mostly disk-like galaxies and are located over the green-valley and red sequence of the color-magnitude diagram of galaxies at their redshift. By using their UV and IR emission, we find that PACS-detected LBGs tend to be less dusty…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
