Constraining the primordial orbits of the Terrestrial Planets
R. Brasser, K. Walsh, D. Nesvorny

TL;DR
This study models the impact of giant planet migration on terrestrial planets to infer their primordial orbital configurations, suggesting lower initial orbital excitation and a five-planet giant system.
Contribution
It introduces direct modeling of terrestrial responses to giant planet migration, constraining their primordial angular momentum deficit and proposing a five-planet giant system scenario.
Findings
Primordial AMD was between 10% and 70% of current value.
A five-planet giant system better explains terrestrial orbital constraints.
Mars was likely more eccentric and inclined initially.
Abstract
Evidence in the Solar System suggests that the giant planets underwent an epoch of radial migration that was very rapid, with an e-folding timescale shorter than 1~Myr. It is probable that the cause of this migration was that the giant planets experienced an orbital instability that caused them to encounter each other, resulting in radial migration. Several works suggest that this dynamical instability occurred `late', long after all the planets had formed and the solar nebula had dissipated. Assuming that the terrestrial planets had already formed, then their orbits would have been affected by the migration of the giant planets. As a result, how did the orbits of the terrestrial planets change? And can we use this migration to obtain information on the primordial orbits of the terrestrial planets? We directly model a large number of terrestrial planet systems and their response to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
