Characterizing the Orbital and Dynamical State of the HD 82943 Planetary System With Keck Radial Velocity Data
Xianyu Tan (1), Matthew J. Payne (2), Man Hoi Lee (3), Eric B. Ford, (4), Andrew W. Howard (5), John. A. Johnson (6), Geoff W. Marcy (7), Jason T., Wright (8) ((1) U Arizona, (2) CfA, (3) HKU (4) U Florida, (5) U Hawaii, (6), Caltech, (7) UC Berkeley, (8) Penn State)

TL;DR
This study analyzes 10 years of Keck radial velocity data to determine the orbital configuration of the HD 82943 system, confirming a 2:1 mean-motion resonance with stable, coplanar planetary orbits.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive dynamical analysis supporting the 2:1 resonance and constrains the system's inclination and planetary masses using multiple fitting methods.
Findings
Supports 2:1 mean-motion resonance configuration
Constrains system inclination to about 20 degrees
Finds the system's best-fit orbits are dynamically stable
Abstract
We present an updated analysis of radial velocity data of the HD 82943 planetary system based on 10 years of measurements obtained with the Keck telescope. Previous studies have shown that the HD 82943 system has two planets that are likely in 2:1 mean-motion resonance (MMR), with the orbital periods about 220 and 440 days (Lee et al. 2006). However, alternative fits that are qualitatively different have also been suggested, with two planets in a 1:1 resonance (Gozdziewski & Konacki 2006) or three planets in a Laplace 4:2:1 resonance (Beauge et al. 2008). Here we use \c{hi}2 minimization combined with parameter grid search to investigate the orbital parameters and dynamical states of the qualitatively different types of fits, and we compare the results to those obtained with the differential evolution Markov chain Monte Carlo method. Our results support the coplanar 2:1 MMR…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
