Signatures of the differential Klein-Nishina electronic cross section in Compton's quantum theory of scattering of radiation
Vinay Venugopal, Piyush S Bhagdikar

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that Compton's quantum theory of radiation scattering aligns closely with the Klein-Nishina cross section, especially at high photon energies, offering insights into photon-electron interactions and quantum mechanics foundations.
Contribution
It shows a quantitative match between Compton's quantum theory predictions and the Klein-Nishina cross section, highlighting the significance of energy regimes and interaction contributions.
Findings
High match between photon energy and Klein-Nishina cross section at high energies
Energy of scattered photons and recoil electrons align with theoretical predictions
Implications for quantum mechanics and photon-electron interaction mechanisms
Abstract
A quantum theory of scattering of radiation by a stationary free electron based on photon conception and relativistic kinematics, applying the principles of conservation of energy and conservation of momentum was proposed by Compton to explain the scattering of X-rays and {\gamma}-rays by light elements. The relativistic differential cross-section for the Compton scattering of a photon by a stationary free electron was formulated by Klein and Nishina using Dirac's relativistic theory of electrons, and has been verified experimentally, when the binding energy of the electron is negligible compared to the incident photon energy. Here we show that the energy of scattered photons, and kinetic energy of recoiled electrons obtained from Compton's quantum theory of scattering of radiation, show a degree of matching (that increases with the increase of incident photon energy as quantified by…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
