Nonequilibrium dynamical mean-field theory based on weak-coupling perturbation expansions: Application to dynamical symmetry breaking in the Hubbard model
Naoto Tsuji, Philipp Werner

TL;DR
This paper develops and tests a weak-coupling perturbation approach within nonequilibrium dynamical mean-field theory for the Hubbard model, revealing its accuracy limits and applying it to study dynamical symmetry breaking.
Contribution
It introduces a practical weak-coupling impurity solver for nonequilibrium DMFT and demonstrates its effectiveness in analyzing symmetry breaking dynamics in the Hubbard model.
Findings
Bare-diagram expansion yields more accurate results than bold-diagram expansion.
Fourth-order bare expansion improves weak-coupling results but fails at intermediate interactions.
Transient dynamics are governed by a nonthermal critical point, indicating a nonthermal universality class.
Abstract
We discuss the general formalism and validity of weak-coupling perturbation theory as an impurity solver for nonequilibrium dynamical mean-field theory. The method is implemented and tested in the Hubbard model, using expansions up to fourth order for the paramagnetic phase at half filling and third order for the antiferromagnetic and paramagnetic phase away from half filling. We explore various types of weak-coupling expansions and examine the accuracy and applicability of the methods for equilibrium and nonequilibrium problems. We find that in most cases an expansion of local self-energy diagrams including all the tadpole diagrams with respect to the Weiss Green's function (bare-diagram expansion) gives more accurate results than other schemes such as self-consistent perturbation theory using the fully interacting Green's function (bold-diagram expansion). In the paramagnetic phase at…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
