Estimating the large-scale angular power spectrum in the presence of systematics: a case study of Sloan Digital Sky Survey quasars
Boris Leistedt, Hiranya V. Peiris, Daniel J. Mortlock, Aur\'elien, Benoit-L\'evy, Andrew Pontzen

TL;DR
This paper develops a quadratic estimator framework to accurately measure the large-scale angular power spectrum in galaxy surveys, effectively mitigating systematics and enabling reliable cosmological analysis of SDSS quasar data.
Contribution
It introduces a novel quadratic estimator method with systematic mode projection to obtain unbiased large-scale power spectra from contaminated survey data.
Findings
The method successfully reduces systematic contamination in SDSS quasar data.
The UVX quasar sample with improved masks shows no residual systematics.
The approach enables the use of contaminated data for cosmological studies.
Abstract
The angular power spectrum is a powerful statistic for analysing cosmological signals imprinted in the clustering of matter. However, current galaxy and quasar surveys cover limited portions of the sky, and are contaminated by systematics that can mimic cosmological signatures and jeopardise the interpretation of the measured power spectra. We provide a framework for obtaining unbiased estimates of the angular power spectra of large-scale structure surveys at the largest scales using quadratic estimators. The method is tested by analysing the 600 CMASS mock catalogues constructed by Manera et al. (2013) for the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS). We then consider the Richards et al. (2009) catalogue of photometric quasars from the Sixth Data Release (DR6) of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS), which is known to include significant stellar contamination and systematic…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
