
TL;DR
This paper argues that Cartesian assumptions underpin misunderstandings in quantum mechanics and consciousness, proposing a non-Cartesian philosophy to fundamentally reshape our understanding of both.
Contribution
It introduces a non-Cartesian philosophical framework that reinterprets quantum mechanics and consciousness, challenging traditional assumptions and clarifying their conceptual foundations.
Findings
Identifies Cartesian assumptions as root of interpretative issues
Proposes non-Cartesian philosophy to unify understanding of quantum mechanics and consciousness
Suggests new perspectives on explaining consciousness and quantum phenomena
Abstract
It is argued that the problem of interpreting quantum mechanics, and the philosophical problem of consciousness, both have their roots in the same set of misguided Cartesian assumptions. The confusions underlying those assumptions are analyzed in detail. It is sometimes suggested that quantum mechanics might explain consciousness. That is not the suggestion here. Rather it is suggested that an adequate non-Cartesian philosophy would transform our understanding of both quantum mechanics and consciousness. Consequently, it would change our ideas as to just what it is that we are trying to explain.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Philosophy and Theoretical Science · Embodied and Extended Cognition
