Dynamical Mean Field Approximation Applied to Quantum Field Theory
Oscar Akerlund, Philippe de Forcrand, Antoine Georges, Philipp Werner

TL;DR
This paper applies the Dynamical Mean Field approximation to scalar phi^4 quantum field theory, evaluating its accuracy across dimensions and comparing it with other methods, revealing its strengths and limitations in predicting phase transitions and critical behavior.
Contribution
The study extends DMFT to quantum field theory, systematically analyzing its performance in different dimensions and improving understanding of phase transition predictions.
Findings
DMFT predicts first order transitions in 2D and 3D, which is problematic.
In 4D, DMFT captures the second order transition at small couplings.
In 5D and higher, DMFT yields qualitatively correct results and better critical couplings than mean field theory.
Abstract
We apply the Dynamical Mean Field (DMFT) approximation to the real, scalar phi^4 quantum field theory. By comparing to lattice Monte Carlo calculations, perturbation theory and standard mean field theory, we test the quality of the approximation in two, three, four and five dimensions. The quantities considered in these tests are the critical coupling for the transition to the ordered phase and the associated critical exponents nu and beta. We also map out the phase diagram in four dimensions. In two and three dimensions, DMFT incorrectly predicts a first order phase transition for all bare quartic couplings, which is problematic, because the second order nature of the phase transition of lattice phi^4-theory is crucial for taking the continuum limit. Nevertheless, by extrapolating the behaviour away from the phase transition, one can obtain critical couplings and critical exponents.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
