Reply to "Comments on Origin of cosmic magnetic fields"
Leonardo Campanelli
TL;DR
This paper defends the authors' previous claim that inflation naturally produces cosmic magnetic fields, countering recent criticisms by clarifying the physical and mathematical validity of their results.
Contribution
The authors provide a rebuttal demonstrating that their earlier results on inflation-generated cosmic magnetic fields are valid and address criticisms effectively.
Findings
Criticisms against the original results are unfounded
The original model remains valid under scrutiny
Inflation remains a plausible origin for cosmic magnetic fields
Abstract
In "L. Campanelli, arXiv:1304.6534 [astro-ph.CO]", we have shown that cosmic magnetic fields are a natural consequence of inflation. Our results have been criticized in the recent comment "R. Durrer, G. Marozzi and M. Rinaldi, arXiv:1305.3192 [astro-ph.CO]." We show that the arguments raised against the validity of our results are physically and mathematically unfounded.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.