The limitations of the Poincar{\'e} inequality
Derek W. Robinson, Adam Sikora

TL;DR
This paper investigates the validity of the Poincaré inequality for a class of degenerate elliptic operators, revealing conditions under which it holds or fails, and analyzing the ergodic properties of the associated semigroup.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of when the Poincaré inequality holds for generalized Grušin operators, highlighting the effects of degeneracy and growth at infinity.
Findings
Poincaré inequality holds if n≥2 or certain conditions on δ₁, δ₁' when n=1.
Failure of the inequality occurs for n=1 with δ₁∈[1/2,1) due to local degeneracy or growth.
The semigroup is non-ergodic when δ₁∈[1/2,1), ergodic but with only local Poincaré inequality otherwise.
Abstract
We examine the validity of the Poincar\'e inequality for degenerate, second-order, elliptic operators in divergence form on . We assume the coefficients are real symmetric and for some where is a generalized Gru\v{s}in operator, \[ H_\delta=-\nabla_{x_1}\,|x_1|^{(2\delta_1,2\delta_1')}\,\nabla_{x_1}-|x_1|^{(2\delta_2,2\delta_2')}\,\nabla_{x_2}^2 \;. \] Here , , , and if and if . \smallskip We prove that the Poincar\'e inequality, formulated in terms of the Riemannian geometry corresponding to , is valid if , or if and but it fails if…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Harmonic Analysis Research · Numerical methods in inverse problems · Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations
