A holomorphic transformation to a miniversal deformation under *congruence does not always exist
Lena Klimenko

TL;DR
This paper investigates the existence of holomorphic reduction transformations to miniversal deformations of matrices under *congruence, showing that such transformations do not always exist, unlike in similarity and congruence cases.
Contribution
It proves that holomorphic reduction transformations to miniversal deformations under *congruence are not always possible, highlighting a fundamental difference from similarity and congruence cases.
Findings
Holomorphic transformations exist for similarity and congruence cases.
Such transformations do not always exist for *congruence.
This reveals a limitation in the holomorphic reduction theory for matrices.
Abstract
V.I. Arnold [Russian Math. Surveys 26(2) (1971) 29-43] constructed miniversal deformations of square complex matrices under similarity. Reduction transformations to them and also to miniversal deformations of matrix pencils and matrices under congruence can be taken holomorphic. We prove that this is not true for reduction transformations to miniversal deformations of matrices under *congruence.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMatrix Theory and Algorithms · Mathematics and Applications · graph theory and CDMA systems
