Comparison of HI and optical redshifts of galaxies - The impact of redshift uncertainties on spectral line stacking
Natasha Maddox (1), Kelley M. Hess (1), S.-L. Blyth (1), M.J. Jarvis, (2, 3) ((1) University of Cape Town, (2) University of Oxford, (3), University of the Western Cape)

TL;DR
This study compares optical and HI redshifts, showing their agreement and analyzing how redshift uncertainties impact spectral line stacking, providing guidelines for future survey planning to improve detection sensitivity.
Contribution
It demonstrates the relationship between optical and HI redshifts and quantifies how redshift errors affect spectral stacking, offering practical guidelines for survey design.
Findings
Optical and HI redshifts agree with negligible systematic offset.
Redshift errors below ~150 km/s minimally impact stacked profile width.
Guidelines are provided for the number of spectra needed for desired sensitivity.
Abstract
Accurate optical redshifts will be critical for spectral co-adding techniques used to extract detections from below the noise level in ongoing and upcoming surveys for HI, which will extend our current understanding of gas reservoirs in galaxies to lower column densities and higher redshifts. We have used existing, high quality optical and radio data from the SDSS and ALFALFA surveys to investigate the relationship between redshifts derived from optical spectroscopy and neutral hydrogen (HI) spectral line observations. We find that the two redshift measurements agree well, with a negligible systematic offset and a small distribution width. Employing simple simulations, we determine how the width of an ideal stacked HI profile depends on these redshift offsets, as well as larger redshift errors more appropriate for high redshift galaxy surveys. The width of the stacked profile is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
