Comparative Study of ERP Implementation Methodology Case Study: Accelerated SAP VS Dantes & Hasibuan Methodology
M. Hilman, F. Setiadi, I. Sarika, J. Budiasto, and R. Alfian

TL;DR
This paper compares two ERP implementation methodologies, Accelerated SAP and Dantes & Hasibuan, using specific metrics, finding that Accelerated SAP performs slightly better overall.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of ERP implementation methodologies from vendor and generic perspectives, highlighting their relative effectiveness.
Findings
Accelerated SAP is slightly more effective than Dantes & Hasibuan methodology.
The comparison uses specific metric measurements for evaluation.
Vendor perspective methodology shows marginal superiority.
Abstract
Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system is a concept of enterprise system that describe the integration of the whole process in the organization. Study in this field mostly about external development paradigm on information system development. So, issue in ERP is all about how to adopt it in the organization, not about the application development. This paper reviews two methodologies on ERP system implementation, one is vendor perspective methodology and new generic perspective methodology. Comparation of both methodology is done in this study using certain metric measurements. Result is the vendor perspective slightly superior than new generic perspective methodology.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsERP Systems Implementation and Impact · Information Technology Governance and Strategy
