Pure bound field corrections to the atomic energy levels and the proton size puzzle
Alexander L Kholmetskii, Oleg V Missevitch, Tolga Yarman

TL;DR
This paper proposes a correction to atomic physics equations considering the bound electromagnetic field, which helps resolve the proton size puzzle and aligns theoretical predictions with experimental results for hydrogen and muonic hydrogen.
Contribution
It introduces a novel correction method based on total momentum conservation, addressing inconsistencies in atomic physics equations and providing a unified estimate for proton size across different atomic systems.
Findings
The correction yields a proton radius of approximately 0.841 fm.
It explains discrepancies in Lamb shift measurements for hydrogen and muonic hydrogen.
Predictions differ from standard calculations in high-Z meso-atoms, supported by some experimental data.
Abstract
Reinforcement of the puzzle about the proton charge radius r, stimulated by the recent experiments with muonic hydrogen induced news discussions on the subject, and now some physicists are ready to adopt the exotic properties of muon, lying beyond the Standard Model, in order to explain the difference between the results of muonic hydrogen experiments (r=0.84087(39) fm) and CODATA-2010 value r=0.8775(51) fm based on electron-proton scattering and H spectroscopy. In the present contribution we suggest a way to achieve a progress in the entire problem via paying attention on a logical inconsistency of fundamental equations of atomic physics, constructed by analogy with corresponding classical equations without, however, taking into account a purely bound nature of electromagnetic field generated by electrically bound particles in the stationary energy states. We suggest eliminating this…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
