The $L^2$-cohomology of a bounded smooth Stein Domain is not necessarily Hausdorff
Debraj Chakrabarti, Mei-Chi Shaw

TL;DR
This paper presents an example of a Stein domain with non-Hausdorff $L^2$-cohomology, challenging assumptions about the relationship between Stein domains and the topological properties of their $L^2$-cohomology.
Contribution
It constructs a specific Stein domain where the $L^2$-Dolbeault cohomology is non-Hausdorff, illustrating that Steinness does not guarantee Hausdorff $L^2$-cohomology.
Findings
The domain is biholomorphic to a product in $C^2$ and is Stein.
The usual Dolbeault cohomology vanishes in positive degrees.
The $L^2$-Cauchy-Riemann operator does not have closed range on certain forms.
Abstract
We give an example of a pseudoconvex domain in a complex manifold whose -Dolbeault cohomology is non-Hausdorff, yet the domain is Stein. The domain is a smoothly bounded Levi-flat domain in a two complex-dimensional compact complex manifold. The domain is biholomorphic to a product domain in , hence Stein. This implies that for , the usual Dolbeault cohomology with respect to smooth forms vanishes in degree . But the -Cauchy-Riemann operator on the domain does not have closed range on -forms and consequently its -Dolbeault cohomology is not Hausdorff.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHolomorphic and Operator Theory · Analytic and geometric function theory · Geometric and Algebraic Topology
