Non-Abelian Topological Order on the Surface of a 3D Topological Superconductor from an Exactly Solved Model
Lukasz Fidkowski, Xie Chen, Ashvin Vishwanath

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that strongly interacting three-dimensional topological superconductors can have gapped, symmetric surfaces with non-Abelian topological order, challenging the belief that such surfaces must be gapless.
Contribution
It introduces exactly solvable models showing how surface topological order can realize time reversal symmetry anomalously in 3D topological superconductors, including non-Abelian states.
Findings
Constructed an exactly solvable Walker-Wang model for non-Abelian surface topological order.
Proposed the SO(3)_6 non-Abelian topological order as a surface state for odd n TScs.
Linked surface topological orders to bulk TSc classifications, including the trivialization at n=16.
Abstract
Three dimensional topological superconductors (TScs) protected by time reversal (T) symmetry are characterized by gapless Majorana cones on their surface. Free fermion phases with this symmetry (class DIII) are indexed by an integer n, of which n=1 is realized by the B-phase of superfluid Helium-3. Previously it was believed that the surface must be gapless unless time reversal symmetry is broken. Here we argue that a fully symmetric and gapped surface is possible in the presence of strong interactions, if a special type of topological order appears on the surface. The topological order realizes T symmetry in an anomalous way, one that is impossible to achieve in purely two dimensions. For odd n TScs, the surface topological order must be non-Abelian. We propose the simplest non-Abelian topological order that contains electron like excitations, SO(3)_6, with four quasiparticles, as a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
